After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these systems. From lie diagnosis tools examined at the border to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being utilised in asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-consultation/ how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to navigate these systems and to follow their legal right for cover.
It also illustrates how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from accessing the programs of protection. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of the technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double impact: although they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also generate it difficult for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.
